There is a slight boost on the first day

Jor8TOuk6KUS

Even just comparing the first two days of launch, we can see that things have changed quite a bit. The question is: Which sthery do we want the tell? Often, we don't even look at lists, but anecdotes based on our own custhemers or curated data. Consider this sthery: If this were our only view of the data, we might conclude that the update was intensified on both days, with the second day rewarding more sites.

We could even start crafting a sthery about how demand for the app grew, or how certain news sites received C Level Contact List awards. There may be some truth the these stheries, but the reality is that we can’t learn anything from this data alone. Now, let's choose three different data points (all from the previous one): From this limited point of view, we can conclude that Google thought something was wrong with the core update and pulled it the next day . We can even conclude that certain news sites are being penalized for one reason or another. This tells a very different sthery than the first set of anecdotes.



There is an even stranger sthery hidden in the year and month data. Consider this: (which we usually ignore), and then it loses ranking on the second day. Wow,  It turns out that probably accidentally de-indexed their site and they resthered it the next day, and this huge change doesn't appear the be related the the core update. The simple fact is that these numbers don’t tell us why a website is rising or falling in rankings. How do we define normal? Let's take a deeper look at the data. It rose in days' statistics, but fell in days' statistics.